Side A: 17:01
- Track 13:42
- Track 24:18
- Track 35:06
- Track 43:55
Find the most balanced sequential split while prioritizing sides that stay under your planning target. Actual cutting decisions depend on level, bass, programme material and the mastering engineer.
Enter exact intended-master durations. The planner tests every possible boundary but never moves a track.
Turn the record after Track 4. This option first minimizes time above your target, then minimizes the difference between sides.
| Turn after | Side A | Side B | Difference | Target |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Track 4 | 17:01 | 17:41 | 0:40 | Within |
| Track 3 | 13:06 | 21:36 | 8:30 | Within |
| Track 5 | 21:45 | 12:57 | 8:48 | Within |
Play the final track on Side A, pause long enough to turn a record, then begin Side B. A mathematically balanced boundary can still weaken the close of one side or waste the opening position of the other.
Side length alone cannot determine level or sound quality. Low-frequency content, stereo information, programme level, groove spacing, sequence, and the engineer's choices all affect what is practical. The selected target is a planning signal, not a mastering limit.
Use times from the intended masters, not rounded streaming displays or another edition. Confirm the release object with How to Identify Album Editions, Reissues and Remasters.
Browse the other transparent listening tools when the decision concerns a playlist, listening session, or blind test.
No. It is only a planning target. Level, bass, stereo information, groove spacing, and the cutting engineer's decisions affect what is practical.
No. It tests every boundary while keeping the entered track sequence fixed.
Use exact durations from the intended masters. Times from another edit or a rounded streaming display can make a close plan unreliable.